The design of everyday things & how software products are still ignoring users

There’s something amazing about coming across people who are truly insightful in their field. One such individual is Don Norman. Years ago, I read his seminal work called ‘The design of everyday things’. You can see more here: http://www.jnd.org/

Now I have to say, I’ve never met Don, but for anyone who cares a whit about the user experience and good design, this book is a must. The reason I bring this up is that I am always surprised how little appreciation there appears to be for usability in the area of software products.

I don’t mean graphic design, I mean getting right inside the head of your user or intended user, understanding what flows and work practices will be most meaningful in a product context and when, often out of ignorance for a certain community of users, vendors design something that will basically alienate the user base.

And so, this brings me neatly to the latest in a long line of offenders in this category… deep breadth, gmail.

Now, I know there are a gizillion people using gmail, among them a lot of very zealous advocates. Plus, it’s not trendy to suggest there could be anything amiss with gmail, in fact it’s gotten so pervasive that the excellent yahoo mail interface has taken on noticeable gmail-esque hues, right down to those oh so square buttons. But… believe me, for a corporate user to not be able to: sort on the ‘sent’ person, categorize mail into folders (not tags), and most annoyingly of all, be forced to consider mail threads as discussions with no easy way to find specific mails within a thread sent by a specific person on a specific date, it makes serious adoption of gmail nearly impossible in a corporate context.

In fact, I was chatting with one of our sales guys and he tells me he has taken to changing the message title when replying in order to split the mail threads when using gmail.

Absolutely gmail has tons of advantages, SaaS being the biggie, aside from the obvious cost/or lack thereof, but as long as it has an interface that flies in the face of accepted norms & genuinely reduces productively for corporate mail users it will never penetrate the corporate environment.

Now, if you have never felt this pain, indeed many people I talk to haven’t then carry on using gmail, but as long as a huge body of potential users are alienated then Outlook will continue to live a long and happy existence. Trust me, I’m no great fan of outlook but after a full year of gmail as my primary interface, I’m finally back to it as of a couple of weeks ago. Ah, the bliss of actually being able to find mails by sorting on sender and being able to categorize them into folders again… I don’t know myself.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

VisibleThread for IT

2:48 minutes
This summary overview shows the business case for using VisibleThread for IT programs. It shows why up to 42% of IT project cost can be attributed to defective documentation and demonstrates how VisibleThread addresses this large business issue.

Red-flagging Bad Language

3:47 minutes
There are some words/phrases that you should avoid in a proposal. This short video shows how VisibleThread scans and red-flags 'bad language' in your RFP Responses.

Using Discovery to spot Gaps

2:28 minutes
Identification of key concepts in issued documents (RFP etc.) helps align the language of the response volumes. Discovery in VisibleThread can uncover mismatches and lack of alignment between issuer and response docs to support reviews and underpin a winning bid.

Validating Win Theme Language

4:43 minutes
Win themes articulate business differentiation. Too often, with multiple contributors and authors, it is hard to keep theme language consistent.

Here we see how VisibleThread validates response docs against win themes by:

Scanning for Compliance Requirements

4:30 minutes
Proposal Managers have to manually scan issued documents or pdfs to spot requirements prefaced with 'shall', 'must' etc. and track them in spreadsheets. This demo shows an 'obligation scan' run against a SOW. All instances of 'will', 'must', 'shall' are identified. It concludes by generating a first pass of an Excel Compliance Matrix.

Collaborations and Team Reviews with
Discussions

5:31 minutes
Managing inputs from multiple contributors and conducting efficient team reviews is critical to successful outcomes. This demo shows how VisibleThread supports collaboration using web based discussions.

Integrating with MS SharePoint

2:36 minutes
VisibleThread integrates seamlessly with MS SharePoint using an intuitive export/import capability. This short demo shows how the integration works in practical terms. We cover:

Plain Language Analysis

4:11 minutes
Plain Language Analysis drives clear documentation. This demo outlines how VisibleThread can identify long sentences, passive langauge and facilitate plain langauge audits.