No-Obligation Live Demo – Next Tuesday @ 11 AM EST / 8 AM PST / 4 PM UK

Get the MAPS RFP shred
IDIQ status · proposals in, awards pending
Last updated September 10, 2026

Army MAPS: What the Final RFP Actually Requires

Solicitation W15P7T26RA0060010, read end to end. The award math, the pass/fail screening questions, the self-score rules, and where to verify all of it yourself.

Quick answers
1
MAPS is a multiple award IDIQ with a $50B ceiling and an ordering period of up to 10 years, consolidating RS3 and ITES-3S.
2
Proposals were due 1200 Eastern on 22 June 2026 through the Digital Market Portal. Questions closed 17 April 2026.
3
70 awards intended per domain: 30 Large Businesses, 25 Small Businesses, 15 Commercial-Sector Vendors.
4
Section 01 Screening Questions are pass/fail. One "no" and the proposal is not evaluated further.
5
Verification never raises a self-score. Your self-score is your ceiling, and undocumented claims can go to zero.

MAPS (Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services) is the Army's consolidation of two of its largest services vehicles, RS3 and ITES-3S, into one multiple award IDIQ. Army Contracting Command-Aberdeen Proving Ground runs it in support of the Capability Program Executive for Enterprise Software and Service. The contract covers uncommon knowledge-based professional services and IT services worldwide, CONUS and OCONUS including hostile areas, for Army customers, DoW agencies, and other federal agencies. Ceiling: $50B. Ordering period: five base years plus one five-year option. Task orders can be firm fixed price, time-and-materials, or cost reimbursement, or a hybrid.

How MAPS got here

Rows in purple are the ones that still govern. For anything newer, check official sources.

Dec 2025
ACC-APG confirms the Army is proceeding with MAPS and opens registration for a pre-solicitation walk-through
Jan 28, 2026
MAPS Industry Day makes the gate-driven structure explicit: baseline clearance, quality, and cyber certifications before anything is scored
Feb–Apr 2026
The February final-RFP release slips after industry feedback; further revised drafts land, raising minimum qualifying project value and adding time-to-fill as a scored element
Apr 17, 2026
Interactive Q&A on the Digital Market Portal closes at 1700 Eastern; questions submitted any other way are not accepted
Amendment 0010
The conformed RFP supersedes and replaces all prior amendments, historical drafts, and Government Q&A. Where anything conflicts, this document controls absolutely Controlling RFP
Jun 22, 2026
Proposals due 1200 Eastern via the Digital Market Portal; proposals stay valid for 360 calendar days from receipt Closed
Now
Rolling verification review is underway, working down from the highest self-scores until 70 verified scores per domain are locked In progress

The five domains

Awards, screening, and scoring all happen per domain. Offerors may propose to more than one, and the cover letter, qualifying projects, and subcontracting plan can be reused, but the Volume II Scorecard has to be unique to each domain proposed.

541330
Engineering, Logistics & Operational Services
Engineering, logistics, manufacturing readiness, medical logistics, technology insertion, integration, interoperability.
541611
Management & Advisory
Acquisition and strategic planning, financial services, training, education, program management, quality assurance, risk management.
541715
RDT&E
Basic, applied and experimental research, modeling and simulation, prototyping and fabrication support, exploratory research.
541512
Emerging IT
Big data and analytics, quantum computing, IT RDT&E, business process reengineering, integration and consolidation, cybersecurity.
541519
Foundational IT
Help desk support, IV&V, IT education and training, IT supply chain management, IT management services, general IT services.

A qualifying project does not have to match the domain it is submitted under, but matching the domain-specific NAICS code is worth 1,000 points per project, up to 3,000.

How the award math works

Highest rated technical offeror per domain, no cost/technical tradeoff. The Government evaluates only as many proposals as it takes to fill the top 70 verified scores, so proposals below that rolling cut line may never be read.

PHASE 1
Rank by self-score
Proposals are ordered highest to lowest self-score, per domain, within each business size group.
PHASE 2
Verification review
Commercial-Sector Vendors are verified first, then Small, then Large. Scores can only move down, potentially to zero.
PHASE 3
Preliminary prospective awardees
Pre-award clearance and responsibility, assisted by the DORA responsibility bot. Large Business subcontracting plans reviewed here.
PHASE 4
Final awardees
70 highest verified scores per domain, with the right to adjust the number of awards up or down without limit.

Section 01 screening questions, by business type

Pass/fail. Answer "no" to any applicable question, or fail to substantiate it, and the proposal is not evaluated further. All certifications must be valid at time of proposal.

Large Businesses
Active Secret facility clearance
ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 9001:2013
CMMC Final Level 2 (self) or higher
CPARS ratings
Small Businesses
Small business certification
Active Secret facility clearance
ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 9001:2013
CMMC Level 2 or higher
CPARS ratings
Commercial-Sector Vendors
Commercial-Sector Vendor confirmation
CMMC Level 2 or higher

Where the points are

Scored element Basis Max points
QP relevance7,000 per project meeting 100% of the domain's technical capabilities21,000
QP recency1,000 per project with performance in the last two years before 22 June 20263,000
Domain NAICS alignment1,000 per project matching the domain-specific NAICS code3,000
Performance qualityPer CPARS/PPQ element (Quality, Schedule, Management): 2,500 Exceptional, 1,875 Very Good, 1,125 Satisfactoryper element
Systems beyond the screening floorLarge Businesses: 2,500 for a Government-determined acceptable property management system, plus accounting system points2,500+

Points shown are from Section M of the conformed RFP. Passthrough rate, vacancy rate, time-to-fill, schedule, and completeness are scored inside each qualifying project form and each needs its own substantiating documentation.

How VisibleThread helps on a self-scored vehicle

Self-scoring changes what proposal work actually is. Nobody wins MAPS on prose. You win it by claiming every point you can defend, and by being able to prove each claim from documents an evaluator will accept, because verification only ever moves your score down.

VisibleThread shreds a 257-page conformed RFP into a structured requirements matrix in minutes, flags every obligation and every place supporting documentation is demanded, and compares amendment to amendment so a superseding document does not quietly invalidate your internal notes. It is deterministic, explainable AI: on a vehicle where the Government verifies everything, you are not trusting a black box for what was actually asked.

Deterministic Explainable Audit-ready

MAPS is the immediate case. The broader one is the same whichever vehicle you chase next: compliance tracking, content reuse across bids, readability and quality review, and a proposal workflow that carries you from RFP release to submission.

Who uses VisibleThread for this kind of work

RS3 and ITES-3S incumbents
Defending a book of business as two vehicles collapse into one, often bidding several domains at once.
Defense primes and systems integrators
Running multi-domain captures where cleared-facility, ISO, and CMMC evidence has to hold up across every submission.
Small business, 8(a) and JV teams
Competing for the 25 small business spots per domain, where every qualifying project has to earn its points.

Customer names and logos are withheld by design on this page. Ask your VisibleThread contact for referenceable case studies in your specific vertical.

See it in action: the MAPS conformed RFP, shredded

We ran the conformed MAPS solicitation, W15P7T26RA0060010 Amendment 0010, all 257 pages of it, through VisibleThread's Simple Shred. Start to finish, from opening the document to a fully categorized shred, took minutes.

Download this exact MAPS shred free.

Fill in the form and we'll send you the full breakdown shown below, plus a free trial so we can run the same shred against your actual next target: a MAPS task order, an amendment compare, or anything else in your pipeline.

app.visiblethread.com/shredding/army-maps
VisibleThread Simple Shred view of the Army MAPS solicitation, showing obligation, submission, and compliance language flagged by dictionary category

What 257 pages of MAPS actually contains, counted rather than skimmed:

Category Instances
Obligation language (shall / will / must)1,074
FAR / DFARS clause references (332 unique)534
Security and compliance terms (CUI, CMMC, clearance)175
Intellectual property and data rights127
Liability and damages43
Law, disputes and protests37
Termination and excusable delay29

That is 1,074 obligation statements a reviewer would otherwise have to catch by eye, on a vehicle where a single unsubstantiated claim can cost you a scored element. And because Amendment 0010 supersedes every prior draft and Q&A, the compare matters as much as the shred.

FAQ

What is Army MAPS?

MAPS, the Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services, is a multiple award IDIQ from Army Contracting Command-Aberdeen Proving Ground. It consolidates RS3 and ITES-3S into a single vehicle for knowledge-based professional services and IT services, with a $50B ceiling and an ordering period of up to 10 years.

When were MAPS proposals due?

No later than 1200 Eastern on 22 June 2026, submitted through the Digital Market Portal. Questions closed 17 April 2026 at 1700 Eastern, and requests for a DoD SAFE code for CUI supporting documentation closed 15 June 2026.

How many awards will the Army make?

70 per domain: 30 Large Businesses, 25 Small Businesses, and 15 Commercial-Sector Vendors. The Government reserves the right to adjust that number up or down without limit, and unfilled Commercial-Sector or Small Business spots can be reallocated to other business types.

What are the five MAPS domains?

Engineering, Logistics and Operational Services (541330); Management and Advisory (541611); RDT&E (541715); Emerging IT (541512); and Foundational IT (541519). Offerors may propose to multiple domains, but only one proposal per legal entity per domain, and the Scorecard must be unique to each domain.

How does the self-scoring actually work?

Offerors self-score the Volume II Scorecard and submit substantiating documents. The Government ranks by self-score, then verifies from the top down. Verification can only lower a score, never raise it, so your self-score is your ceiling. Unverifiable claims can be adjusted down to zero points, and falsified information removes the proposal entirely.

What happens if I miss a screening question?

Section 01 is pass/fail. Answer "no" to any applicable question for your business size, or fail to let the Government verify it, and the proposal is not evaluated further. Certifications have to be valid at the time of proposal and held by the prime, not a teammate.

How many qualifying projects can I submit?

No more than three per domain, up to fifteen Volume III submissions in a full package. A project can be a prime or commercial contract, a task order, a first-tier subcontract, an OTA agreement, or a grant or cooperative agreement. Relevance to the domain's technical capabilities is the single biggest scoring lever at up to 21,000 points.

Does Amendment 0010 replace the earlier drafts and Q&A?

Yes. The amendment states it supersedes and replaces all prior amendments, historical drafts, and Government-provided Q&A, and that its terms take absolute precedence in any conflict. Anything your team wrote against Draft 4 or an earlier Q&A release needs to be re-checked against the conformed RFP.

Last updated: September 10, 2026. Figures on this page are taken from the conformed MAPS RFP, solicitation W15P7T26RA0060010, Amendment 0010. This page will be revised as ACC-APG announces awards.

×

Book a Demo