No-Obligation Live Demo – Next Tuesday @ 11 AM EST / 8 AM PST / 4 PM UK

Get the MAPS RFP shred
Reopened · small business teams only
Last updated October 21, 2026

Army MAPS Reopened: What Amendment 0011 Changes

The Army has reopened MAPS to small business teams, with proposals due November 12, 2026. Who can bid, why the award count did not move, the self-score rules, and where to verify it all yourself.

Quick answers
1
MAPS is a multiple award IDIQ with a $50B ceiling and an ordering period of up to 10 years, consolidating RS3 and ITES-3S.
2
Amendment 0011 reopens MAPS to Small Business Teaming Arrangements. Team proposals are due November 12, 2026.
3
Award counts did not change: 25 small business spots per domain, 125 in total. More teams, same seats.
4
Section 01 Screening Questions are pass/fail. One "no" and the proposal is not evaluated further.
5
Verification never raises a self-score. Your self-score is your ceiling, and undocumented claims can go to zero.

MAPS (Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services) is the Army's consolidation of two of its largest services vehicles, RS3 and ITES-3S, into one multiple award IDIQ. Army Contracting Command-Aberdeen Proving Ground runs it in support of the Capability Program Executive for Enterprise Software and Service. The contract covers uncommon knowledge-based professional services and IT services worldwide, CONUS and OCONUS including hostile areas, for Army customers, DoW agencies, and other federal agencies. Ceiling: $50B. Ordering period: five base years plus one five-year option. Task orders can be firm fixed price, time-and-materials, or cost reimbursement, or a hybrid.

Amendment 0011 · due Nov 12, 2026

What Amendment 0011 changes

In August, GAO sustained a protest against the original solicitation's teaming ban. The Army had allowed small business joint ventures but barred small business prime/subcontractor teams, and GAO held that the choice between those two structures belongs to the offeror, not the agency. Amendment 0011 is the Army's corrective action, and it is narrow.

Who can submit
Small Business Teaming Arrangements: a small business prime with other small businesses as subcontractors. Small businesses that bid standalone can withdraw and resubmit as a team.
Who cannot revise
Large Businesses, small business joint ventures, and small businesses that stay standalone primes. Their June proposals stand as submitted.
What did not change
The award count. Still 25 small business spots per domain, 125 across all five. More teams competing for the same seats pushes the verified-score cut line up.

Three weeks, run in parallel

There isn't time to find a teammate first and write second. A partner only helps if their qualifying projects raise your score without adding a screening or compliance risk, so the workstreams have to overlap.

01
Compare 0010 to 0011
Diff the amendments so you rework only what changed, not the whole proposal.
02
Re-score with a partner
Model whether a teammate's projects actually move your self-score, and check their CPARS, clearance and CMMC.
03
Rebuild the evidence
Every point you claim needs substantiating documentation, including the ones that now come from your teammate.
04
Review and submit
Run the compliance check against the amended requirements before the November 12 deadline, not after.

How MAPS got here

Rows in purple are the ones that still govern. For anything newer, check official sources.

Dec 2025
ACC-APG confirms the Army is proceeding with MAPS and opens registration for a pre-solicitation walk-through
Jan 28, 2026
MAPS Industry Day makes the gate-driven structure explicit: baseline clearance, quality, and cyber certifications before anything is scored
Feb–Apr 2026
The February final-RFP release slips after industry feedback; further revised drafts land, raising minimum qualifying project value and adding time-to-fill as a scored element
Apr 17, 2026
Interactive Q&A on the Digital Market Portal closes at 1700 Eastern; questions submitted any other way are not accepted
Amendment 0010
The conformed RFP supersedes all prior amendments, historical drafts, and Government Q&A. It still carries the scoring rules on this page
Jun 22, 2026
Original proposals due 1200 Eastern via the Digital Market Portal
Aug 2026
GAO sustains a protest against the ban on small business prime/sub teams and recommends the Army amend the solicitation
Oct 2026 · Amendment 0011
MAPS reopens to Small Business Teaming Arrangements only. Small business award counts are unchanged Current
Nov 12, 2026
Small business team proposals due Open

The five domains

Awards, screening, and scoring all happen per domain. Offerors may propose to more than one, and the cover letter, qualifying projects, and subcontracting plan can be reused, but the Volume II Scorecard has to be unique to each domain proposed.

541330
Engineering, Logistics & Operational Services
Engineering, logistics, manufacturing readiness, medical logistics, technology insertion, integration, interoperability.
541611
Management & Advisory
Acquisition and strategic planning, financial services, training, education, program management, quality assurance, risk management.
541715
RDT&E
Basic, applied and experimental research, modeling and simulation, prototyping and fabrication support, exploratory research.
541512
Emerging IT
Big data and analytics, quantum computing, IT RDT&E, business process reengineering, integration and consolidation, cybersecurity.
541519
Foundational IT
Help desk support, IV&V, IT education and training, IT supply chain management, IT management services, general IT services.

A qualifying project does not have to match the domain it is submitted under, but matching the domain-specific NAICS code is worth 1,000 points per project, up to 3,000.

How the award math works

Highest rated technical offeror per domain, no cost/technical tradeoff. The Government evaluates only as many proposals as it takes to fill the top 70 verified scores, so proposals below that rolling cut line may never be read.

PHASE 1
Rank by self-score
Proposals are ordered highest to lowest self-score, per domain, within each business size group.
PHASE 2
Verification review
Commercial-Sector Vendors are verified first, then Small, then Large. Scores can only move down, potentially to zero.
PHASE 3
Preliminary prospective awardees
Pre-award clearance and responsibility, assisted by the DORA responsibility bot. Large Business subcontracting plans reviewed here.
PHASE 4
Final awardees
70 highest verified scores per domain, with the right to adjust the number of awards up or down without limit.

Section 01 screening questions, by business type

Pass/fail. Answer "no" to any applicable question, or fail to substantiate it, and the proposal is not evaluated further. All certifications must be valid at time of proposal.

Large Businesses
Active Secret facility clearance
ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 9001:2013
CMMC Final Level 2 (self) or higher
CPARS ratings
Small Businesses
Small business certification
Active Secret facility clearance
ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 9001:2013
CMMC Level 2 or higher
CPARS ratings
Commercial-Sector Vendors
Commercial-Sector Vendor confirmation
CMMC Level 2 or higher

Where the points are

Scored element Basis Max points
QP relevance7,000 per project meeting 100% of the domain's technical capabilities21,000
QP recency1,000 per project with performance in the last two years before 22 June 20263,000
Domain NAICS alignment1,000 per project matching the domain-specific NAICS code3,000
Performance qualityPer CPARS/PPQ element (Quality, Schedule, Management): 2,500 Exceptional, 1,875 Very Good, 1,125 Satisfactoryper element
Systems beyond the screening floorLarge Businesses: 2,500 for a Government-determined acceptable property management system, plus accounting system points2,500+

Points shown are from Section M of the conformed RFP. Passthrough rate, vacancy rate, time-to-fill, schedule, and completeness are scored inside each qualifying project form and each needs its own substantiating documentation.

How VisibleThread helps on a self-scored vehicle

Self-scoring changes what proposal work actually is. Nobody wins MAPS on prose. You win it by claiming every point you can defend, and by being able to prove each claim from documents an evaluator will accept, because verification only ever moves your score down.

VisibleThread shreds a 257-page conformed RFP into a structured requirements matrix in minutes, flags every obligation and every place supporting documentation is demanded, and compares amendment to amendment so a superseding document does not quietly invalidate your internal notes. It is deterministic, explainable AI: on a vehicle where the Government verifies everything, you are not trusting a black box for what was actually asked.

Deterministic Explainable Audit-ready

MAPS is the immediate case. The broader one is the same whichever vehicle you chase next: compliance tracking, content reuse across bids, readability and quality review, and a proposal workflow that carries you from RFP release to submission.

Who uses VisibleThread for this kind of work

RS3 and ITES-3S incumbents
Defending a book of business as two vehicles collapse into one, often bidding several domains at once.
Defense primes and systems integrators
Running multi-domain captures where cleared-facility, ISO, and CMMC evidence has to hold up across every submission.
Small business, 8(a) and JV teams
Competing for the 25 small business spots per domain, now as prime/sub teams, where every qualifying project has to earn its points.

Customer names and logos are withheld by design on this page. Ask your VisibleThread contact for referenceable case studies in your specific vertical.

See it in action: the MAPS conformed RFP, shredded

We ran the conformed MAPS solicitation, W15P7T26RA0060010 Amendment 0010, all 257 pages of it, through VisibleThread's Simple Shred. Start to finish, from opening the document to a fully categorized shred, took minutes.

Download this exact MAPS shred free.

Fill in the form and we'll send you the full breakdown shown below, plus a free trial so we can run the same shred against your actual next target: a MAPS task order, an amendment compare, or anything else in your pipeline.

app.visiblethread.com/shredding/army-maps
VisibleThread Simple Shred view of the Army MAPS solicitation, showing obligation, submission, and compliance language flagged by dictionary category

What 257 pages of MAPS actually contains, counted rather than skimmed:

Category Instances
Obligation language (shall / will / must)1,074
FAR / DFARS clause references (332 unique)534
Security and compliance terms (CUI, CMMC, clearance)175
Intellectual property and data rights127
Liability and damages43
Law, disputes and protests37
Termination and excusable delay29

That is 1,074 obligation statements a reviewer would otherwise have to catch by eye, on a vehicle where a single unsubstantiated claim can cost you a scored element. And with Amendment 0011 now out, the 0010-to-0011 compare matters as much as the shred.

FAQ

What is Army MAPS?

MAPS, the Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services, is a multiple award IDIQ from Army Contracting Command-Aberdeen Proving Ground. It consolidates RS3 and ITES-3S into a single vehicle for knowledge-based professional services and IT services, with a $50B ceiling and an ordering period of up to 10 years.

When are MAPS proposals due now?

Original proposals were due 22 June 2026. Under Amendment 0011, small business teams have until November 12, 2026 to submit. That date applies only to Small Business Teaming Arrangements, not to anyone revising a standalone bid.

How many awards will the Army make?

70 per domain: 30 Large Businesses, 25 Small Businesses, and 15 Commercial-Sector Vendors. The Government reserves the right to adjust that number up or down without limit, and unfilled Commercial-Sector or Small Business spots can be reallocated to other business types. Amendment 0011 did not add small business awards: it is still 125 across the five domains.

What are the five MAPS domains?

Engineering, Logistics and Operational Services (541330); Management and Advisory (541611); RDT&E (541715); Emerging IT (541512); and Foundational IT (541519). Offerors may propose to multiple domains, but only one proposal per legal entity per domain, and the Scorecard must be unique to each domain.

How does the self-scoring actually work?

Offerors self-score the Volume II Scorecard and submit substantiating documents. The Government ranks by self-score, then verifies from the top down. Verification can only lower a score, never raise it, so your self-score is your ceiling. Unverifiable claims can be adjusted down to zero points, and falsified information removes the proposal entirely.

What happens if I miss a screening question?

Section 01 is pass/fail. Answer "no" to any applicable question for your business size, or fail to let the Government verify it, and the proposal is not evaluated further. Certifications have to be valid at the time of proposal and held by the prime, not a teammate.

How many qualifying projects can I submit?

No more than three per domain, up to fifteen Volume III submissions in a full package. A project can be a prime or commercial contract, a task order, a first-tier subcontract, an OTA agreement, or a grant or cooperative agreement. Relevance to the domain's technical capabilities is the single biggest scoring lever at up to 21,000 points.

What does Amendment 0011 change?

It opens a narrow window for small business prime/subcontractor teams, following a GAO protest decision in August. Small businesses that bid standalone can withdraw and resubmit as a team. Large Businesses, small business joint ventures, and small businesses staying standalone cannot revise. Compare 0011 against 0010 before reusing anything from your June submission.

Last updated: October 21, 2026. Scoring figures are taken from the conformed MAPS RFP, solicitation W15P7T26RA0060010, Amendment 0010. Reopening details reflect Amendment 0011. This page will be revised as ACC-APG announces awards.

×

Book a Demo